uno muy ilustrativo sobre el tema del que quiero hablar es este: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penis
Que conste que a mí no me parece mal que en una enciclopedia aparezcan fotos explícitas de los órganos sexuales, es algo necesario si se quiere tratar con cierta profundidad y rigor el tema, pero me temo que el fervor de la gente por colaborar con material sin copyright se puede tornar excesivo.
¿Realmente son necesarias 5 fotos de rabos pinochos, depilados y con lubricante para explicar lo que es una polla? Me parece a mí que los exhibicionistas han encontrado un nuevo nicho ahí, y cuelgan sus fotos en la wikipedia para excitarse sabiendo que sus miembros viriles serán contemplados por cientos de miles de personas al día...
He vuelto a ojear el artículo y ahora sólo quedan 3 fotos y un diagrama. Le estoy echando un vistazo a la página de la discusión sobre el artículo, a ver qué cuenta la gente... y me encuentro con que es bastante más larga y divertida la discusión que el propio artículo.
La verdad es que algunos son tronchantes (de troncho):
Ah-ha-ha! That photo of an erect penis isn't a penis - it's a Monster Penis! It rises way above that guy's navel, and is enormous in girth. That's a gay-porn penis. The other penises pictured fall into the range of sizes for the vast majority of penises. What a joke.16:01, 12 October 2007 (UTC)Seguid leyendo por vuestra cuenta si queréis, que no tiene desperdicio.That image needs to be replaced (image: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Erect_penis_with_labels.jpg), it is really unnecessary to have that type of image on wikipedia. Someone replace it with a picture that would actually be used in a medical text book - if a medical text book would work for doctors, then it will work for wikipedia. 71.195.168.138 02:33, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
I agree! The image is ridiculous, he is all hard, shaved, and lubed up like straight out of a porn. I didn't have Wikipedia when I was a little kid, but I'm sure I was curious and looked up "penis" in the Encyclopedia Britannica. If I would have seen an image like that, I would probably have been emotionally scarred. Whoever added it must be a perv.
Yeah! like who is the dude with the ego? You need to post your dick for the whole world to see. Would some please replace that photo with a medical illustration.
I bet it is Stew17s own penis. Lame.
If you look at the proportionality of the penis itself, it doesn't seem particularly large. The shaving helps show the testicles clearly, and a "flaccid only" policy would be censorship. Erections needn't be a mystery topic. This photo also shows the contour of the shaft clearly. I believe most encyclopedias would leave people with the misconception that the body of a penis is just a cylinder with a tiny urethra down the center -- see the top illustration, for example. 72.244.206.38 06:49, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
About that image, I know it's gross but it didn't make thorw up or emotionally scar me at all and I'm 10 turning 11 next year. You are just over reacting. Patrickstar2 (talk) 11:45, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
I protest the fact that there are no pictures of black/asian/anything else penises here. Black guys have dicks too.
- No shit? I've been limiting my dick sucking to only a tiny percentage of the population? I've wasted my life! Seriously though, what do you think of a montage of penises of all races/sizes etc.? I think that would probably be the best approach for any wikipedia article about a human physical feature. We should always strive to be representative of all the different variations of a given thing so that readers are aware of all the different looks of a thing that fall under a given name. I volunteer you to go out and start asking men on the street of all different races if you can photograph their penises. 69.171.60.23 19:46, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
can a penus be removed when you have cancer in it and still urneate
- Yes. It's easy to remove your penis. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.171.60.23 (talk) 19:47, 21 February 2007 (UTC).
- Just make sure you twist the shaft counter-clockwise until it comes loose; clockwise will tighten it.
I think it's funny that all the penis photographs are "oriented" from left to right. How Western| of us! 129.137.160.100 16:22, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
I Think that if you want pitures of black and asian cocks then take a pic of your cock and put it on here. simple as that!--Random05 23:11, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
Obviously it's only white men who are exhibitionists! talk 16:44 20 January 2008 (UTC)
- It is a bit weird that all of the images on this page show the foreskin either fully retracted or entirely cut off. Worldwide, only around 15% of men are circumcised, and the other 85% don't exactly walk around all day with their foreskins pulled right back.
Por suerte, el mecanismo de regulación (que no censura) popular parece que funciona bien y la wikipedia no se convierte en un medio de difusión de porno amateur (que para eso existen otros sitios mucho más eficaces que todos conocemos y huelga en la redundancia que yo comente aquí ;-D).
Aquí os dejo la lista de imágenes no aptas para la wikipedia para que os echéis unas risas con lo friki que puede llegar a ser la gente (¡sí, hay fotos de auto-felaciones! xD), eso sí también os advierto que hay algunas imágenes dignas de rotten dot com.